Page 17 - Decoding Decisions ~ Making sense of the messy middle
P. 17

17    CHAPTER 2      IDENTIFYING THE MESSY MIDDLE









                          This sequence of looking for products and then weighing options equates
                          to two different mental modes: exploration and evaluation. And, as it turns
                          out, they are the key to understanding the messy middle. Exploration is an
                          expansive activity, while evaluation is inherently reductive. When exploring,
                          we add brands, products, and category information to mental portfolios or
                          “consideration sets”. When evaluating, we narrow down those options.

                          In McKinsey’s consumer decision-making model  (one of our favourite recent
                                                                           5
                          models), these modes are combined into a single “active evaluation” phase.

                          However, our research suggests that they are cognitively distinct with different
                          reward systems and, as such, different tactics are required to connect with
                          consumers depending on whether they are exploring or evaluating.

                          The difference between giving a consumer information about a category or
                          product and actively closing a sale is subtle but important. In any transaction
                          choice is power, and consumers are now more powerful than ever before.
                          Sending the wrong signal at the wrong moment could be highly disruptive,

                          with the result that the offending brand is jettisoned from the shopper’s
                          consideration set.


                          The science behind explore and evaluate


                          Next we wanted to validate that explore and evaluate fit within the existing

                          body of behavioural science. So, we went back to our stack of books and
                          periodicals to see if anyone else had identified a similar pattern of behaviour.

                          One theory that closely matched our hypothesis is “information foraging”,
                                                                                                    6
                          which describes behaviours humans exhibit to reduce energy expenditure
                          whilst maximising gain. Historically, this theory was derived from a food
                          foraging theory which helped biologists understand animals’ feeding
                          strategies – in the case of a predator: how much energy is required to hunt
                          prey versus the energy that will be gained from eating it? Applying these

                          theories to online behaviour could explain how we explore and evaluate: how
                          easy is it to find the information we need and how useful will that information
                          be? If it’s useful, we tend to exhaust the information at that location before
                          proceeding to the next. If not, we rapidly switch sources before we expend
                          too much energy.






                            5 McKinsey (2009), https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-consumer-decision-journey#
                            6 Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22